OK
So I found out that my workflow was totally incorrect from Pete's last post......
A dive into my old signal processing textbook, gave me hints but then looking at some computer graphics textbooks told me what to do.....
I have a LOT of reprocessing to do!
Thanks Pete!
Depending on the seeing conditions some data might not need to be binned. Looking at the ccd_suitability The GT131 with the 294 is the correct pixel size for good seeing conditions, but if the seeing drops to average then software binning will be needed.
The GT131 looks like a fun scope to image with, but it must be massive!
Daniel
OK
So I found out that my workflow was totally incorrect from Pete's last post......
A dive into my old signal processing textbook, gave me hints but then looking at some computer graphics textbooks told me what to do.....
I have a LOT of reprocessing to do!
Thanks Pete!
I agree, p7 2x2 with 4+un pixels would be perfect and get the most out of the pier and local seeing conditions :) the 294 sensor has pixels to spare so its not a big deal like you wont have enough left lol
Steve
Please ignore my dylexia wherever possible, just be thankful I can control my Tourettes ;)
Things to do, so little time!
Steve
Roboscopes Tea Boy
great...Yes the software bin especially on that camera is so worth while....and you get better results than hardware binning
That M27 is nice and deep
Peter Shah
Roboscopes Observatory Controller
This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.
You have declined cookies. This decision can be reversed.
FLI
656 Imaging
10 Micron
Planewave
ZWO
Roboscopes
802 Kingsbury Road
Birmingham
B24 9PS
United Kingdom
This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.